Burntide Official Website › Reviews
Burntide Reviews: Ratings and What Buyers Say
Burntide is rated 4.6 out of 5 from 742 written reviews.
The rating sits behind 6,664 orders, and 89% of reviewers say they would recommend it. The star split and recurring comments are shown below.
Before you order, compare the packs.
Everything the review record contains, including what it cannot tell you and one inconsistency inside it.
The Burntide review numbers, as published
The star split
What that split says
Two thirds of reviewers give five stars and one in five gives four. The interesting number is the bottom: five per cent leave two stars or one, which is about thirty-seven of the 742 written reviews.
A perfect five-star wall would be the thing to distrust. A distribution with a real tail in it is what a genuine review set looks like, and the tail is published here at the same size as the rest.
What the Burntide review data actually is
This is the part most review pages leave out, and leaving it out is what makes them look fabricated.
The distributor supplies an aggregate, a star split, a roster of eight named reviewers with real detail attached to each, and two sentences of review text between the eight. It does not supply transcripts. Six of the eight carry one line and two carry the other.
Fed straight into a review-card component, two sentences across eight names produces a column of identical quotes, which is the single most recognisable signature of a manufactured review page. So this page does not do that. It prints the roster as a table, because every column in it is specific and real, and it prints the two sentences as the two summary themes they actually are, with the count attached to each.
The alternative would have been to write eight richer quotes. That is manufacturing testimonials, it is the one thing this desk will not do, and it is worth naming as the road not taken.
The eight Burntide reviewers on record
| Reviewer | Age | City | Rating | Pack bought | Written on | Theme |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nate A. | 67 | Kansas City, MO | ★★★★★ | 3 jars | day 25 | A |
| Pete P. | 57 | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★★ | 6 jars | day 43 | B |
| Leon E. | 43 | Las Vegas, NV | ★★★★★ | 6 jars | day 42 | A |
| Miguel A. | 62 | Seattle, WA | ★★★★★ | 6 jars | day 23 | A |
| Walter W. | 55 | Chicago, IL | ★★★★★ | 6 jars | day 28 | A |
| Walter M. | 43 | Miami, FL | ★★★★★ | 6 jars | day 43 | A |
| Bill R. | 43 | Charlotte, NC | ★★★★★ | 3 jars | day 47 | A |
| Miguel S. | 41 | Dallas, TX | ★★★★ | 2 jars | day 50 | B |
Eight reviewers, eight cities, ages from 41 to 67. The “written on” column is the day of use on which each review was left, and it is the most useful column in the table: it runs from day 23 to day 50, with a median around day 42.
That range is the practical answer to how long to wait before judging this product, and it lines up with the distributor’s own summary figure of 3–6 weeks. Nobody on this roster reviewed it in week one.
The two recurring Burntide lines, and the counts behind them
“Daily habit stuck. Reordered before the last jar.”
6 of the 8 reviewers on record carry this line. Six of the eight reviewers on record carry this line. It is about the routine rather than about a result, which is what a once-daily chewable is most likely to deliver.
“Fair at a month. Wanted more in week one.”
2 of the 8 reviewers on record carry this line. Two of the eight carry this one, and it is the criticism the distributor prints against itself. Week one is exactly when nothing has happened yet.
The three lines the pack attributes to one person each
“Daily gummy.”
Nate, 67“Wait past week two.”
Pete, 57“Desk answered.”
Walter, 55Three short lines, three named people. They are printed here exactly as supplied and they are not padded out into paragraphs. “Wait past week two” from Pete, 57, is the most useful sentence on this page and it is also the one that argues against an impulse purchase.
What Burntide buyers liked, and what they did not
The distributor publishes both, and both are printed here at the same size.
What buyers liked
The once-a-day gummy format and the 60-day window.
Both of those are about the purchase rather than about an effect, which is consistent with everything else on this website. A once-daily chewable is easy to keep up, and a 60-day window makes trying it low-risk.
What buyers disliked
A slow start, and wanting more to have happened in week one.
This is the criticism the seller prints against itself, and it is accurate. Week one is exactly when nothing has happened. A 525 mg blend is not going to announce itself, and anyone expecting it to will be disappointed on schedule.
Two things in the Burntide record that do not line up
Two things in the published record do not quite line up, and both are printed here rather than tidied away.
The most-ordered pack. The distributor’s summary names three jars as the top pack. Five of the eight reviewers on the roster bought six. Eight people are a sample and 6,664 orders are the population, so the summary is the better guide, and it is also possible that people who buy six jars are simply more likely to write a review. Either way, the two figures disagree and you should know that.
A two-jar order. Miguel S. of Dallas is recorded as having bought two jars. There is no two-jar pack on the ladder this website shows. The most likely explanations are two separate one-jar orders or a pack that is no longer offered. This desk does not know which, and does not intend to guess.
Why print either of these. Because a review page that has been smoothed until nothing in it disagrees with anything else has been edited, and an edited review page is worth nothing. Two small inconsistencies in a published record are what an unedited record looks like.
What the Burntide review record cannot tell you
A review record is evidence about an experience of buying. It is not evidence about a product, and the difference matters enough to state.
- Nobody in this record had a control. There is no comparison group, no blinding and no placebo, so a reviewer who reports a change cannot know what caused it.
- People who buy something expect it to work. That expectation is itself capable of producing reported effects, which is why controlled trials exist.
- Reviewers are self-selected. People with strong feelings write; people who forgot about the jar do not.
- Nothing here is a health outcome. No weight, no measurement, no laboratory value appears anywhere in this data.
- Burntide itself has never been trialled. The research cited on this website studied apple cider vinegar and beta-hydroxybutyrate as ingredients, at amounts far above what a 525 mg blend can hold.
The NIH fact sheet on weight-loss supplements is the neutral read on how thin the evidence is across this whole category, and a review of obesity supplements reaches the same place from the research side. The FTC's consumer advice on weight-loss advertising covers the marketing half. All three are more useful than any number of stars.
What people ask about the Burntide review record
What is Burntide's review score?
4.6 out of 5 from 742 written reviews behind 6,664 orders, with 89% of reviewers saying they would recommend it.
Are the Burntide reviews real?
The aggregate and the roster are the distributor's own published records. What it does not publish is full transcripts: eight named reviewers share two sentences between them, which is why this page prints themes with counts rather than eight quote cards.
How long did reviewers wait before writing about Burntide?
The eight dated reviews on record run from day 23 to day 50, with a median around day 42. The distributor's summary puts the most common wait at three to six weeks.
What do Burntide reviewers complain about?
A slow start, and wanting more to have happened in week one. Two of the eight reviewers on record carry that line.
Which Burntide pack do most buyers choose?
The distributor's summary names three jars. The eight-person roster skews to six jars, which is a sample rather than the population.
Do the Burntide reviews prove it works?
No. There is no control group, no blinding and no measurement anywhere in the record. It is evidence about an experience of buying, not about the product.
Research behind this Burntide page
Every source below was opened and checked, and every PubMed record was confirmed against the NCBI record before it was written down. None of them studied Burntide itself. They concern the ingredients, at the amounts the researchers used.
- National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements. Dietary Supplements for Weight Loss: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals. https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/WeightLoss-HealthProfessional/
- Rios-Hoyo A, Gutierrez-Salmean G. New dietary supplements for obesity: what we currently know. Curr Obes Rep. 2016;5(2):262-70. PMID 27053066. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27053066/
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Questions and Answers on Dietary Supplements. https://www.fda.gov/food/information-consumers-using-dietary-supplements/questions-and-answers-dietary-supplements
- Federal Trade Commission, Consumer Advice. The Truth Behind Weight Loss Ads. https://consumer.ftc.gov/articles/truth-behind-weight-loss-ads
Order Burntide on the official website
4.6 out of 5 from 742 written reviews, and sixty days to form your own.
Price and pack sizes are shown on the checkout page
Order Burntide On The Official WebsiteOne gummy a day · 30 per jar · 60-day money-back guarantee · lot BUR-26/BU-8141